I decided to write this review absolutely spontaneously. My friend recommended to watch it although the way how he described and understood it was absolutely wrong. It is not an easy movie to watch, but somehow it kept my mouth opened. I thought that it is a movie made in 2001, but later I had to read it on the internet to believe that it was made in 1968 and it was just about futuristic 2001. The director of the movie Stanley Kubrick have done incredible work right even before the first Apollo 11 journey to the moon. This review is based on the story explanations in filmsite.org, C. Clarces merits in the movie from "read with style" blog
Figure1
Figure2
The second thing is the style. Cold colour palette and silence sounds depicts the mood. Kubric wasn't the only one who initiated the whole ambience to the movie. "2001 A Space Odyssey is the result of a collaboration between two great minds - the mind of the science-fiction writer C. Clarke and the mind of the director Stanley Kubrick." (Read With Style, Monday, 21 February 2011) (The novel was actually published after the movie screening). Mostly everything in the movie was hand made or improvised and experimented with simple light effects. It is just mind blowing because it easily hits most of the CG science fiction movies to the bottom of the deepest and darkest hole. The reason why it might be hard to understand the surreal part is that even the superhuman is shown with so much esthetics and beauty while in today's movies you expect to see clearly muscular and hyperbolic macho version of a human. It might be also hard to read the visions of lights and the scene when character starts to age very quickly. Those are also more symbolic struggles of life, reaching for the goal and stepping into another world.
Figure3
This movie just makes you to think at least a little bit about your mentality, point and value of existence, maybe death. Better then anywhere else it is said about it: "Only a few films are transcendent, and work upon our minds and imaginations like music or prayer or a vast belittling landscape...Alone among science-fiction movies, 2001 is not concerned with thrilling us, but with inspiring our awe." (Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times, March 27, 1997.
Bibliography:
Filmsite link
Read with style
Illustrations:
Dom! I just LOVE that you felt compelled to review this movie - with f**king quotes and a (sort of) bibliography. You've made an old man very happy tonight!
ReplyDeleteYes, it's like a warm up. :DD I'm glad that I've done it anyway.
ReplyDeleteBook is great too. The film and book are intended to viewed and read together.
ReplyDeleteI also kind of like the often forgotten sequel film, 2010. Its a more traditional Hollywood sci-fi film. No where near as good as 2001 of course, but still a worthy film.
Thanks for the advice, Tom. I'll definitely watch it sooner or later.
ReplyDeleteThe film is quite epic with a live orchestra too Dom, if they put that on in Southbank as they say they will, see if you can get tickets for that. It gave me goosebumps :)
ReplyDelete